The
new buzzword in church circles today is leadership. And the thrust seems to be
towards “inclusiveness, balance, and diversity” in spiritual leadership at
every level of church administration, from local congregations to the General
Conference.
This
emphasis on leadership could be a legitimate response to the increasing
complexity and challenges facing our growing church. But it could also be a
reaction against leadership abuse and incompetence at the different levels of
church administration. Samuel Pipim
In
the ongoing discussion, a few seem to be questioning the legitimacy of an
exclusive spiritual leadership by elders or pastors of the church. However, for
a majority the real issue is “diversity in leadership.” It appears that almost
everyone or every interest group wants a piece of the church’s leadership pie.
Not surprisingly, there are calls for “bold and creative” leadership in the
church.
In
the same vein, some churches are also electing youth as “junior elders.”
Advocates argue that since young people have many wonderful talents and
abilities to be harnessed by the church, appointing them as “junior elders” is
the best way to mentor spiritual leaders for tomorrow’s church.
Others,
borrowing from the leadership models in today’s megachurches, have embraced
certain notions of “anointed and visionary” leadership. In some cases, pastors
with dictatorial tendencies have made themselves the sole leaders and CEOs of
their local congregations or administrative levels, and are unilaterally or
arbitrarily imposing their wills and agendas on the constituencies of the
church units to which they have been appointed. Pastors who are more benevolent
have practically marginalized the church-appointed board of elders and have replaced
it with their own handpicked “leadership facilitators” and “leadership
committees,” making these new “leadership teams” the spiritual leaders of the
church.
Leadership
is also the new banner under which feminist interest groups are now campaigning
subtly for their agenda. In the name of “inclusiveness and gender sensitivity
or gender diversity” there is a renewed push for “women in leadership”—by which
they mean “women elders,” “women pastors,” and “women clergy.” Carefully
crafted “women in leadership” seminars, conferences, certification programs,
and study materials are being widely promoted to “empower” and “advance”women
as “partners in leadership.”
When
egalitarian philosophy is applied to discussions on Biblical leadership,
advocates claim that anyone should be allowed to serve as a spiritual leader in
the church, even if there seem to be Biblical restrictions against such a move.
For those who do not know what the Bible actually teaches, when the egalitarian
ideology is married to certain interpretations of the Biblical concepts of
“equality” and “the priesthood of all believers,” the push for “inclusive
leadership” can be very seductive. Know more about this at Eaglesonline
website.
No comments:
Post a Comment